29yrswithaGApass 2,226 Posted June 20, 2022 Report Share It is sad that the Switliks lost all their personal belongings like that but they sort of forced Great Adventure’s hand as the article states. I do think GA was kind when the house went up for auction. No other bidders made an offer so the park could’ve gotten the house for a steal but they paid the Switliks market value instead even though they didn’t have to. Quote Link to comment
Daved Thomson 78 Posted June 21, 2022 Report Share I agree. Great Adventure was pretty nice when It came to not only the real estate acquisitions they made to somewhat satisfy the judgements against the Switliks, but even the personal property mentioned here. When you consider the entirety of the legal battle between the two parties (Hardwick and Switlik), I tend to agree with the final outcome ultimately reached by the Supreme Court. The crazy part, in my opinion, is that all of the problems between the two seem to have been created, not by Stanley Switlik, but by his son Richard. I get the impression that he had stuck his nose into his father's business (meaning the land sale to Hardwick) when his father was comfortable with what had been agreed upon with Hardwick, because Richard wanted the land himself. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Comments